Understanding your rights as a defendant is paramount to your criminal law case. When you are taken into custody, it becomes a necessity to know what you are entitled to and what law enforcement’s obligations are towards you. One such obligation pertains to the reading of your Miranda rights. But what happens if you aren’t read these rights? I, Scott A. Hamblin, provide dedicated legal representation to those accused of criminal conduct. As an experienced criminal defense lawyer, I offer insight into the significance of Miranda rights and the implications for both suspects and law enforcement when these rights are neglected. Contact my firm today if you’d like to discuss your specific circumstances.
Firstly, let us examine what Miranda rights actually are. Stemming from the landmark Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona (1966), these rights are meant to protect individuals in police custody from self-incrimination during interrogations. The typical Miranda warning reads as follows:
“You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You also have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford a lawyer, one will be provided for you.”
These rights serve as a protective shield, ensuring that you do not inadvertently incriminate yourself without understanding the consequences.
Now, what happens if you aren’t read these rights? Contrary to popular belief, the failure to read Miranda rights does not automatically result in the dismissal of a case. However, it does have significant repercussions for the prosecution. Specifically, any statement made by a defendant who was not properly Mirandized becomes inadmissible in court. This means that if law enforcement fails to read a suspect their Miranda rights before interrogation, any self-incriminating statements made by the suspect cannot be used against them at trial.
If you find yourself in a situation where you were not read your Miranda rights, this could potentially be used to your advantage. An experienced attorney can challenge the admissibility of any statements you made, thereby weakening the prosecution’s case. However, it is important to note that law enforcement does not need to read Miranda rights on every arrest. They are only obligated to do so if they intend to interrogate you while you are in custody.
Understanding your Miranda rights and the implications of not being read these rights can significantly impact the outcome of a criminal case. While not being read your rights does not automatically result in case dismissal, it can weaken the prosecution’s case, potentially tipping the scales in your favor.
However, navigating the intricacies of criminal law can be complex. Therefore, it is highly recommended to seek the assistance of a seasoned attorney who can guide you through the process, advise you on your rights, and advocate for you both in and out of court. Remember, when it comes to criminal law, knowledge is power – but having an experienced attorney by your side is an invaluable asset. Contact my law office today to set up a consultation.
A Jefferson City man faced DUI charges following a field sobriety test. Charges against the defendant were dropped after Scott successfully maintained the client’s claims that the test results were inaccurate. While the client initially appeared to be in a difficult situation, Scott was able to push investigators to determine the sobriety test results as invalid, so the charges were dismissed.
A mother was seeking sole custody of her children following a divorce. The father refused to cooperate, leaving the client in a difficult situation as she felt as though her children didn’t have a voice. Scott recognized her need for an advocate and carefully listened to the children’s wishes, which conclusively helped the client achieve sole custody of her children and protected their best interests.
A client from Fulton was accused of drug possession as a result of a home search. While drug charges may potentially be filed as a Class C felony involving severe consequences, Scott was able to help the client receive a reduced sentence. Ultimately, the client faced significantly smaller penalties compared to the initial charges.
Scott assisted a defendant in a particularly challenging divorce case in which the other spouse was not cooperating. Scott was able to help the client avoid court through an aggressive legal approach to resolve all outstanding disagreements while maintaining the client’s long-term needs.
One client sought legal assistance after an altercation with another individual in Jefferson City. The client was arrested on assault charges despite allegedly not starting the fight. Since an arrest can lead to life-altering penalties such as being terminated from employment and serving jail time, Scott was able to build a solid legal defense in the client’s favor and argued in favor of the client’s innocence.
A grandparent sought visitation rights to his grandchild after the parent tried to block him. Scott takes grandparents’ rights very seriously, and so he devised a strategy to help the grandparent set a visitation schedule. Scott developed a strategy to show that the child’s best interests were fulfilled through the grandparent’s ability to visit the child, helping push the case towards a resolution in the client’s favor.
Scott assisted a client who was injured in a car accident due to another driver’s negligence. The defendant claimed that the opposing party using their phone at the time of the crash, and Scott emphasized this claim to show that the other driver was at fault for the client’s injuries. The case concluded with the client receiving the necessary compensation for medical bills following a long hospital stay due to injuries.
Scott and his office were so helpful, thorough and professional during a very adversarial divorce. He offers good solid advice. He does not pursue options which will more than likely not yield a good result ( unless the client insists). He strives to give his clients the best results for their money. He's personable but professional. He answers inquiries quickly and clearly. Highly recommend!
Mr. Hamblin is one of the best attorneys we have ever had the privilege to use. He is courteous and to the point. I would recommend him to anyone and we will continue to use his services.
Scott Hamblin is simply put - the best! Scott deserves 10 stars! He has all the qualities a person could ask for with legal representation and more. I even had a lawyer from another county tell me, Mr. Hamblin is an excellent lawyer. That remark alone told me how respected he is, by his peers. He's highly professional, extremely knowledgeable, respectful and courteous, does his due diligence to understand and know his case, has excellent communication skills with his staff and client. His performance in the court room arena was exciting to watch. Dynamic! I knew when I walked into…
Scott Hamblin is the best lawyer that I have ever met. He really cares about his clients and does not sugar coat anything. He works very hard to help his clients, and knows the law very well, and he will work with you on your tab if he can. The staff there is very helpful too. I would recommend Scott and that law firm to anyone that needs a lawyer. They are the best. And you get what you pay for, so give them a call.
I am very pleased with Mr. Hamblin. I needed an attorney for my custody case and I did not know who to use. I found Mr. Hamblin on the internet. All the reviews I read and now my experiences with him and his team are spot on. I was being denied reasonable time with my daughter. Her mother attempted to continue to limit my time but Mr. Hamblin's hard work and dedication to my case resulted in equal custody of my daughter. I highly recommend Mr. Hamblin!
I was thoroughly impressed with Scott Hamblin and his team, Madasyn and Cameo, as they represented me in a very difficult case, involving multiple businesses and complexities. Scotts knowledge and expertise was invaluable. He and his team involved me every step of the way throughout the entire process. I was included in email correspondences, as well as, phone and video calls with witnesses and experts. What stood out, and set Scott and his team apart from my previous counsel, was their authenticity and genuineness. They truly cared about me as an individual and truly cared about my case Scott and…
Finding an attorney is not easy, and in my case I was in a child custody modification that was being dragged out and messy. This went on for a full 3.5 years. I had other representation at the time that I didn’t feel was doing what was best for me and my kids. I reached out to Scott after taking time to review others reviews and asking around in the community for a collective opinion. Scott is hands down the most honest, direct, family law attorney I could have asked for. If I had a question or needed advise him…
My divorce was with a difficult person, Mr.Hamblin handled every aspect of the divorce, professionally and quickly, his experience and knowledge was extremely helpful. thank you, Mr.Hamblin for your support.
Scott helped us with a very difficult situation with utmost professionalism and expertise. He was at all times very professional and considerate of our needs. He provided excelent advise.
Scott will forever be regarded by myself as the best divorce lawyer in Jefferson City bar none. His service, expertise, knowledge and dedication to all of his clients is top notch. I hope that no one ever finds themselves in a position of his services, but if you do, you cannot make a wrong choice with him at your side. Scott was able to get a fair and equitable decision in my case and he will most certainly do the same for you if necessary. His knowledge of the law and experience from every case he has ever tried were…
For accessible and experienced representation, contact attorney Scott Hamblin today.
NUVEW | Copyright 2025 All Rights Reserved | Accessibility Notice | Privacy Policy
The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising. This information is designed for general information only. The information presented should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship. Past results and testimonials are not a guarantee, warranty, or prediction of the outcome of your case, and should not be construed as such. Past results cannot guarantee future performance. Any result in a single case is not meant to create an expectation of similar results in future matters because each case involves many different factors, therefore, results will differ on a case-by-case basis. By providing contact information, users acknowledge and give explicit consent to be contacted via the methods of communication provided, including SMS. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. Reply STOP to opt out.
